Side by side comparison of a landscape with some herbicide treatment and no herbicide treatment.
Forestry Research and Outreach
Document

Post-Fire Factsheet: Managing Competing Vegetation with Herbicide

Reviewed by: UC Cooperative Extension Post-Fire Forest Resilience Stewardship Team

Release Date: March 2026

Extensive, high-severity wildfires in California’s conifer forests have impeded natural forest regeneration, leaving the future of these forests at risk (Welch et al. 2016). Post-fire reforestation efforts extend far beyond seed collection and planting. Though often overlooked, site-preparation and post-planting removal of competing vegetation are essential to ensure the survival of vulnerable conifer seedlings. The primary reason to control the growth of shrubs and grasses is to increase the survival and development of planted tree seedlings (and to reduce fuels). Resprouting species, as well as invasives, often dominate and thrive in disturbed landscapes. Without control, competition for soil moisture, can reduce growth or outright kill planted conifers, as well as native herbaceous species (Plamboeck et al. 2009). See Post-Fire Managing Competing Vegetation to Improve Reforestation Outcomes.


Herbicides are well known as an effective and relatively inexpensive method to control vegetation. Research, including a 20-yearlong study from the US Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Research Station, has documented herbicide’s ability to promote the growth of larger trees in post-fire landscapes (Zhang et al. 2022; McDonald and Fidler 2010). 

Native plant species also benefit from the removal of dominating post-fire shrub species, like Ceanothus species and Arctostaphylos (manzanita) species. Herbicide use can increase native plant species richness in reforested areas (DiTomaso et al. 1997; Bohlman et al. 2016) which promotes future forest health, wildlife habitat and ecosystem resilience. 

As with other tools used in post-fire management, including mastication, grazing, and prescribed fire, there are tradeoffs in selectivity, timing, and cost. Often, multiple treatment approaches are required to effectively meet management objectives.

Concerns over the potential environmental impact of herbicides, specifically glyphosate, have prompted further investigation that addresses its use in forestry (Busse et al. 2001, Tatum 2004).

 

Herbicides: Pre- and Post-Emergent 

Pre-emergent: These herbicides are applied extensively to the soil during site preparation to prevent the germination or emergence of plant species that would compete with the tree seedlings to be planted. Since pre-emergent herbicides are applied before seedlings are planted, conifer tolerance of a selected herbicide is not a concern. A common pre-emergent herbicide in forest management is hexazinone, known for its efficacy to control the growth of woody shrubs. 

Post-emergent: These herbicides kill plants on direct contact with foliage and are applied after the target plant species has already emerged from the soil. These are often applied in post-fire environments, where naturally growing and planted seedlings may be intermixed with surviving and resprouting competing species. Resprouting vegetation is not controlled with pre-emergent herbicides, therefore targeting of oaks and shrubs like greenleaf manzanita, tanoak, and chinquapin, requires use of a post-emergent herbicide.

For both types, pre- and post-emergent, the timing of herbicide application is critical. As more time passes, the target competing species becomes more established therefore harder and more expensive to control.

Mode of Action, Selectivity, and Timing

Other differences between herbicides are based on their mode of action, selectivity, timing, and application method. Herbicides work through various metabolic mechanisms, or modes of action, to disrupt plant growth. Common modes of actions for herbicides used within forestry are prohibiting photosynthesis, preventing plant growth and causing uncontrolled and excessive growth (See table below). 

Selectivity: Selectivity refers to the ability of an herbicide to effectively control the desired target species while minimizing impacts to desired plants. The components of an herbicide can influence its selectivity, including the active ingredient, formulation, and application rate. Selectivity can also be influenced by the timing and location of the application. Identifying the desired selectivity of an herbicide is a critical component of a vegetation management plan and determines the herbicide recommended by a licensed professional.

Timing: Timing of herbicide application influences its efficacy. Treatments should be applied during specific growth stages to effectively kill targeted species and to avoid detrimental impacts on the desired species. Applications during the dormant season, or at certain growth stages may help prevent impacts to desired species.

Application: Application methods vary from broadcast or direct foliar spraying, stem injectors, and others depending on desired selectivity. Applying the product directly to undesired vegetation can safeguard the seedlings you are trying to protect. 

Side by side comparison of a landscape with some herbicide treatment and no herbicide treatment.
Image 1: Comparison of treatments after the 2021 Caldor Fire. On the left no herbicide was used and lots of Ceanothus resprouted. On the right, post-emergent herbicide was used to reduce shrubs before planting. Photo by Nic Dutch, UC ANR.
Landscape with pre and post emergent herbicide application.
Image 2: A combination of pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicide treatments in Plumas County. Photo by Nic Dutch, UC ANR.

Herbicide Use for Reforestation 

The type of herbicide and how it is applied can influence which species are favored for and method growth and survival over others. Applying pre-emergent herbicides before post-fire tree planting offers several benefits. Utilizing pre-emergent herbicides before post-fire tree planting has many advantages. Pre-emergent treatments work before invasive plants and shrubs germinate, reducing the need for control after seedlings are established. Since they are applied prior to planting, it also lowers the risk of herbicide injury to seedlings that sometimes occur with post-planting applications. 

Post-emergent herbicides can also be used selectively with directed applications to the target plants’ foliage. To avoid impact on growing conifers, foliar application should ideally occur between late summer and fall after the seedlings’ buds have hardened.

Herbicide selection depends on the target vegetation species, as well as local environmental considerations. Effective control of multiple plant species—and the protection of tree seedlings—often requires an integrated approach that combines pre- and post-emergent herbicides, sometimes using a mix of different herbicides to support successful reforestation.

Regulations, Safety, and Compliance 

The use of herbicides is subject to regulatory oversight to ensure their safe and responsible application. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) regulates the licensing, sale, and use of pesticides under state laws, which are often more restrictive than regulations of the federal government and most other states. California regulations require that a licensed pest control advisor (PCA) provides a written recommendation based upon strict adherence to product guidelines and restrictions, and in consideration of local ecology. Only certified PCAs and DPR certified applicators may apply herbicides, wearing personal protective equipment. Regulations and permitting may vary by county, so be sure to contact your local County Agricultural Commissioner for regulatory information, as well as technical assistance. For an informed conversation with a PCA, read the table below and look up herbicides via the Herbicide Resistance Action Committee.

 

 

Works Cited

Bohlman, G, M North&HD Safford. 2016. Shrub removal in reforested post-fire areas increases native plant species richness. Forest Ecology and Management. 374: 195-210 374:195–210.

Busse, MD, AW Ratcliff, CJ Shestak, & RF Powers. 2001. Glyphosate toxicity and the effects of long-term vegetation control on soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33:1777–1789.

DiTomaso, JM. 1997. Herbicides in California forestry. In: Weed Science - in search of excellence. Proc. 49th Ann. Conf. Calif. Weed Sci. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc., Fremont, CA. p. 113-117.

Fredrickson, E & M Gray. 2021. Chapter 8: Vegetation Management. Reforestation Practices for Conifers in California. UC, Berkeley. 

McDonald, PM & GO Fiddler. 2010. Twenty-five years of managing vegetation in conifer plantations in north and central California: results, application, principles, and challenges. PSW-GTR-231. Albany, CA: 87 p 231.

Oester, PT & S Fitzgerald. 2020. Enhancing Reforestation Success in the Inland Northwest. Oregon State University Extension Service. PNW 520.

Plamboeck, A, M North & T Dawson. 2008. Conifer seedling survival under closed-canopy and manzanita patches in the Sierra Nevada. Madrono 55(3): 193–203 55:193–203.

Shepard, JP, J Creighton & H Duzan. 2004. Forestry herbicides in the United States: an overview. Wildlife Soc  Bulletin 32:1020–1027.

Tatum, VL. 2004. Toxicity, transport, and fate of forest herbicides. Wildlife Soc Bulletin 32:1042–1048.

Tubbesing, CL, DJN. Young, RA York, SL Stephens, & JJ Battles. 2022. Incorporating shrub neighborhood dynamics to predict forest succession Trajectories in an altered fire regime. Ecosystems 25:136–154.

Welch, KR, HD Safford & TP Young. 2016. Predicting conifer establishment post wildfire in mixed conifer forests of the N. American Mediterranean-climate zone. Ecosphere 7: e01609.

Zhang, J, KA Finley, DH Young, GO Fiddler & C Looney. 2022. Growth Response of Ponderosa Pine to Intensive Cultural Treatments Varies with Site Quality and Plantation Age. Forest Sci 68:212–225.